Which Supreme Court decision stated that slaves were property and could not sue in federal court, and declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional?

Prepare for the US and Virginia History SOL Test. Access interactive quizzes, featuring flashcards and multiple-choice questions along with detailed hints and explanations. Boost your confidence and ace your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which Supreme Court decision stated that slaves were property and could not sue in federal court, and declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional?

Explanation:
The key idea here is the Dred Scott decision. In 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that enslaved people were property and could not be citizens, so they had no right to sue in federal courts. The same ruling also said Congress could not prohibit slavery in the territories, which meant the Missouri Compromise’s prohibition on slavery north of the 36°30′ line was unconstitutional. This decision intensified sectional tensions by denying federal limits on the spread of slavery and by denying African Americans citizenship in the eyes of the federal government. The other options are not Supreme Court rulings that defined citizenship for enslaved people or struck down the Missouri Compromise.

The key idea here is the Dred Scott decision. In 1857, the Supreme Court ruled that enslaved people were property and could not be citizens, so they had no right to sue in federal courts. The same ruling also said Congress could not prohibit slavery in the territories, which meant the Missouri Compromise’s prohibition on slavery north of the 36°30′ line was unconstitutional. This decision intensified sectional tensions by denying federal limits on the spread of slavery and by denying African Americans citizenship in the eyes of the federal government. The other options are not Supreme Court rulings that defined citizenship for enslaved people or struck down the Missouri Compromise.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy